Multiculturalism vs. Internet Safety

Anyone opposing or exposing the harms that the Internet and social media present to society, and particularly to children, will almost certainly be speaking from a position that expounds humanity’s most evolved standards, and not the standards of centuries ago, or the twisted sub-standards being pushed by globalism in the 21st century.

In other words, the dangers that the Internet poses to vulnerable minds are determined by ‘Western norms’ that were established in the 19th and 20th centuries.

These standards include regarding children separately under the law, in order to prohibit them from certain freedoms that their less developed minds cannot fully comprehend, thereby also protecting them from certain well understood perils.

Yes, the second-class citizen does exist within western society, and should exist, despite what you may have been led to believe by a deceptive and manipulating “equality without borders” narrative. Children’s status as second-class citizens is for their own protection, while others are listed as such, like convicted criminals, for the protection of society as a whole.

Those parents and professionals seeking to restrict children’s access to the Internet, and who speak against the violence, negative images, and mentally destructive messaging that pervades the online world, are almost always from the middle class of Britain, America, Europe, Australia, and other such ‘western’ nations.

This comprehension that their children are being influenced by a highly negative culture that did not exist when they were young, and which they would never knowingly allow within their home, is well observed. The Internet respects no national or cultural borders or boundaries. The Internet is, as George Soros might have put it, “the most Open Society”.

Culture applies to so many different elements of the social sphere. Just as the Amazonian culture is vastly different from the Scottish culture, so too is ‘the City of London’ banking culture vastly different from the poverty class culture that exists within the same country, and within the city that surrounds it – Greater London. In terms of acceptance, never the twain shall meet, and if they do, a culture clash is bound to occur.

Note: The City of London – officially and legally the Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London – is an autonomous city state, separate from the Uk, with its own government, mayor, and police force.

Such a culture clash is exactly what has been happening in respect to the invasion by the global Internet into every previously protected or private element of our society and our lives. Any culture that has access to the Internet is free to infiltrate the mind of any user.

Those who are strongest of mind, filter, resist, or totally reject such alien cultural norms, which are less evolved, less noble, and less worthy of our time and attention than the user has come to expect or accept as the appropriate standard.

This Trojan horse invasion of the civilised mind is simply, in its technological form, the infestation of society by the parasitic class who own and control the social engineering, data mining, and surveillance operations of the Silicon Valley corporations, which operate hand-in-hand with the military-industrial complex. They have their very own culture and agendas, and they have never aligned with the Angloriginal™ culture and the values and standards of the Anglosphere (Western society) as a whole.

Over the last 25 years, the globalist Internet has been forcing a no borders, multiculturalism agenda on every person who has access to the Internet, just as the globalist politicians have been forcing a no borders, multiculturalism agenda on every indigenous member of a Western nation.

So, if you’re waking up to the reality that the Internet (the epitome of multiculturalism) has been pushing negative and destructive ways of thinking on your children, which do not align with your own cultural values, then perhaps it’s also time to realise that you are not a member of the ‘far right’ for thinking that way. You are simply thinking for yourself, and thinking about the welfare of those people you care about, and the values you hold dear.

You are simply defending your own cultural standards and social norms, which you rightly regard as precious, and in doing so, you are protecting your children from certain negative cultural pervasions, which those who do not hold the same values as you, wish to impose on them.

I put it to you that if you believe that there should be borders within the online world – because it is negatively influencing your children and your society, then to be consistent, you must also support the very same safeguards for your children and your society within the real world.

The Angloriginal™ movement calls for an indigenous national Internet 2.0 and indigenous social media with separate social media for children, owned and managed only by indigenous members and councils.

This fenced Internet 2.0 will create not only a nationally secure communication platforms for the people of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, but just as importantly, it will prohibit all negative content produced by foreign and globalist forces, which is severely harming the minds and hearts of our people.

Such indigenous social media and a fenced Internet must be directly owned and operated by indigenous only members, management and staff, to secure its national security and to ensure that indigenous culture and values are properly represented, especially for children.

An indigenous Internet 2.0 and an indigenous social media platform would not mean cancelling out the rest of the Internet, even if that was even possible.

They would simply run as both an alternative for those who want an Internet that promotes indigenous values and has proper moral safeguards, and as a robust national security platform, ensuring the people’s communication with one another in times of national emergency.

It would also prevent transnational corporations and foreign states from ever holding the Anglo nations to ransom over their access to any online services.

Policy proposals like the above are exactly the sort of bold ideas that the people should expect from the mouths of politicians. Sadly, 95% of them are either bought-and-paid-for by the bad guys or too ‘average’ of mind to be capable of such thinking.

The other 5% who are forced into the fringes of politics may well be thinking in such radical and necessary ways, but they stick within the established topics because they are afraid of being portrayed as a less than serious politician by the controlled media. They falsely believe that the people are not ready for monumental changes. So long as those changes hand power and prosperity to the people, they are more than ready for such radical change.

Subscribe to Be Ahead of the Game

To be the first to see the political policy proposals that will genuinely hand the power over to the people, and restore the prosperity and principles that have been robbed from you, your family and your nation, subscribe to Angloriginal posts with the RSS feed https://angloriginal.com/feed in your news reader or subscribe at Substack via angloriginal.substack.com.