Why the English Don’t Riot

Throughout history, the Angloriginal peoples, and particularly the indigenous English, have always been less likely to form mobs than their non-indigenous social, religious and political counterparts.

Perhaps this explains why the English and their Angloriginal neighbours have always been leaps and bounds ahead of other cultures when it comes to forming the social changes required to break the tyrannical rule of the parasitic class and the corrupted religious institutions, which for centuries enslaved them under their feudal and factory systems.

Some less than discerning people may point to incidents such as the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381, to claim that the English have been murderous in their protesting, but in digging just a little deeper, they would come to understand that such violence was a product, not of those Englishmen who had marched into London to demand their freedoms, but of the largely continental cultures that inhabited certain areas within the capital at that time.

London has always attracted countless opportunists from abroad, in search of both legal and illegal financial gain, and the city was no less full of foreign cultures and violence in the 14th century as it is today. It has therefore always been more susceptible to mob rule than the rest of the country.

Those who wish to truly understand the English people must largely ignore London. Yes, of course there have always been many indigenous Englishmen and women in London who have extolled Angloriginal values and norms as much as anywhere else in the country, but on the whole, London has always been its own city state – economically, politically and ideologically.

This cultural separation from the rest of England, originates with the City of London’s William Charter of 1067, essentially giving it autonomous control over its own affairs. It has since always been owned and managed by the parasitic class, becoming the world headquarters for the main financial and governmental control industries of central banking, insurance and freemasonry.

An interesting point to note about the The Peasants’ Revolt is that one of its key driving factors was the exorbitant taxes on the English and Welsh that were being relentlessly increased, in order to fund a foreign war against France.

Known as The Hundred Years’ War, it was just one of a long list of pointless wars that have spanned the centuries, serving only those power-hungry psychopaths who happily used the people as pawns in their pathetic game of thrones.

Seven and half centuries later, and the same parasitic class of psychopaths are still attempting to move their pieces around the geopolitical chessboard, though now it may more accurately be called a ‘games of drones’.

In the 14th and 15th centuries, it was an invading family of Normans who were raising taxes to spill English and Welsh blood on the soil of Normandy and France. In the 21st century, it is the globalist interlopers who have relentlessly raised the taxes on the Angloriginal peoples, in order to spill the indigenous blood of Angloriginals on the soil of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and if they ever get their murderous way in fooling the British people once again, that same pointless loss of your brother’s, husband’s, or children’s blood will flow over the soil of Ukraine and Iran too.

All wars are bankers’ wars!

The same is true of rioting in modern times as in the times of old. Whether in London, or in other cities, the major riots within Britain can always be traced to foreign cultural groups – whether ethnically, religiously or politically. One of the most sinister alien cultures behind rioting in the modern age has been revolutionary socialism, now well documented as being funded by globalist NGOs and billionaires. Since the 1960s, the favoured “useful idiots” (to coin Stalin) of the socialist revolutionaries have been students.

In France and across Europe, we are currently witnessing a re-run by the marxist-globalists of their 1968 student riots in Paris, which they fully instigated and managed. Whether it is student riots in Paris, BLM riots in the US, Antifa riots in London, colour revolutions in Eastern Europe, or the Arab Spring in the Middle East, orchestrated and centrally managed revolutionary socialism has been the single cause of the vast majority of civil violence in the West over the last 70 years.

In other words, the instigators and agitators have never been culturally British. Rioting simply isn’t in the nature of the Angloriginal character. The English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh have always managed to retain their ability to think far more as sovereign individuals than other cultures. We are not naturally tribal. We are predominantly a nation of individual thinkers.

It is due to this significant enough number of the British people refusing to follow the herd, which allowed the world to glimpse a new postglobalist vision that rejected the undemocratic system of EU dictatorship, and shocked the socialist world order of marxism-globalism by voting for BREXIT.

The BREXIT vote was only possible due to this almost unique sovereign thinking of the Angloriginal peoples.

Yes, it is certainly true that there are many in the country who have adopted the hive mind thought process of 20th and 21st century social engineering, but there are still enough true Angloriginals who think for themselves – who think critically and with discernment – to continue to lead society towards an even greater level of human civility, fairness and true democracy, just as we have done throughout history.

Napoleon – the globalist puppet who later went rogue, thereby securing his demise at the hands of the bankster-controlled armies of Great Britain, the Netherlands, Hanover, Brunswick, Nassau, and Prussia – once called the English, “a nation of shopkeepers”. It was an insightful observation, and one which offers more praise than ridicule.

This independent, entrepreneurial English thinking has been a great frustration to the 20th century social engineers (eg. the Fabian Society, the Tavistock Institute etc), who have relentlessly targeted the Angloriginal peoples with their programming techniques, making the UK, and particularly England, the global centre for mass mind control experimentation. From a globalist point of view, if the English can be successfully conditioned to mindlessly obey the state, then every culture can be.

As Gustave Le Bon explained in his seminal book on mass mind control, ‘The Crowd. A study of the Popular Mind’, 1895:
“A Latin crowd, however revolutionary or however conservative it be supposed, will invariably appeal to the intervention of the State to realise its demands. It is always distinguished by a marked tendency towards centralisation and by a leaning, more or less pronounced, in favour of a dictatorship. An English or an American crowd, on the contrary, sets no store on the State, and only appeals to private initiative. A French crowd lays particular weight on equality and an English crowd on liberty… The genius of the race, then, exerts a paramount influence upon the dispositions of a crowd.“

This significant cultural advantage seen not only in the English, but in the Irish, Scottish and Welsh characters too, is what has secured a stubbornly conscious minority of critical thinkers who have successfully called out the repeated attempts to impose a totalitarian state on the British people along with a complete takeover of the Anglo Isles by transnational, globalist forces.

Whether it was refusing to be injected with an untested pharmaceutical, refusing to lose the ability to use cash, or refusing to accept that a non-democratic EU could ever be good for our democracy, a hardcore of indigenous people who truly think for themselves have continued to lead Britons into the light where the majority have so often found themselves being ushered into darkness.

I have yet to hear one puppet politician or military media muppet who relentlessly pushes to fund the war machine against supposed external threats to the country, even once talk about how we must fund our defences against the far more obvious internal threats – the very real and present dangers to the nation from within that the people are witnessing on a daily basis.

Why would any intelligent person trust even one word that comes out of the mouths of such fools and hypocrites, who are either totally blind to such obvious security dangers, or alternatively, are purposefully not presenting them to the public?

Anyone claiming to be working in the interests of the British people’s national security, and yet who sees no national security concern with the destruction of the nation from within by transnational and foreign forces – politically, economically and socially – is clearly not in the right job. Their words and opinions are not worth a bent penny.

Indeed, when a government and the nation’s institutions (think football clubs, manufacturing industries, NHS, public services, communications technology, energy infrastructure, food production and supply, news media etc, etc, etc) have all been bought-and-paid-for by the highest foreign bidder, the only real defence that the people have left are the people themselves.

When the state then begins a move to place as many of that indigenous population on a distant battlefield that has already taken the lives of over a million young men from Russia and Ukraine, the duty of the people is clear.

STOP BELIEVING THE BULLSHIT.

Violence begets violence. Such eternal truths are still lost on the ignorant and probably always be. That is why those with greater intelligence and awareness have a responsibility to lead those who lack it, away from the darkness and into the light.

In regards to the Angloriginal character (European, American and the Anglosphere), it has been proven that even in situations of battlefield warfare, 80-85% of men will purposefully and repeatedly avoid targeting the enemy – another human being. This might simply called “civilised behaviour”.

Army Brigadier General S.L.A. Marshall’s extensive research conclusively showed that only 15-20% of soldiers in World War 2 who found themselves in the line of fire “would take any part with their weapons… whether the action was spread over a day, or two days, or three.” They simply pointed their weapons away from the enemy when firing each shot. I would do the very same. Hopefully you would to.

The other 15%-20% who were happy to point straight at the head of another human being and pull the trigger have what is known in psychology as Antisocial Personality Disorders. In other words they are on the psychopathy spectrum.

So, if you needed any evidence that the vast majority of indigenous people of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales will be on your side if you preach peace and oppose war – whether they publicly admit it or not – now you have that proof.

Normal people are not born killers, despite what the controlled media would like you to imagine. Only a small (but still significant) minority of people lack the empathy required to live peacefully among us.

Thankfully, other research has shown that the vast majority of that 15-20% do not pose a significant danger to others, so long as society does not encourage them to act out their sociopathic tendencies. This was clearly proven to be the case in the late 20th century Western society.

However, in the early 21st century, the inverse is now more evident, as those prior civilised cultural standards and norms have been systematically undermined and removed, whilst a higher number of that potentially dangerous 15-20% of people – young men whose personality type is adventure-seeking, risk taking, opportunism – have been encouraged to enter the West.

It’s important to focus on the thought that such findings as those by Brigadier General Marshall are somewhat comforting. Despite the efforts of Hollywood, social media, and the mainstream news to make you believe that humans are inherently violent, you can somewhat relax in knowing that at least in respect to the Angloriginal peoples, more than 80% of them would go out of their way not to harm a hair on your head.

However, once you know this, an uncomfortable truth becomes apparent. Those who are given the limelight by the controlled media: the politicians, the business leaders, the writers, the producers, the celebrities, the stars, the reporters, the influencers – those who manufacture the general social paradigm you are presented with on a daily level – are far more often than not, that dangerous other – the 15-20% who would happily shoot you in the head, or at least not take decisive action to avoid it happening on their watch.

It is those psychopaths and sociopaths who we must contain, and they live amongst us, just as much as they exist in foreign lands. They are the psychological scum that always rises to the top of the barrel – in politics, in religion, in business, in finance, in the media. If they are not prohibited from occupying such positions of social power, it is exactly those psychopaths who will be encouraging your sons to fight their wars, and using your money to pay for their murder on the battlefield.

The indigenous people of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales demand safe streets at home, not abroad.

They demand their money to be spend on this land, not on foreign lands.

They demand their politicians to be focused on their people, not on people from elsewhere.

That is how any nation should be run, and must be run. It is not just charity that begins at home. Politics, business, and security must also begin at home, and more often than not, they must end there too.

There are a thousand and one national security concerns that relate solely to matters within the borders of this nation, and they all require urgent attention before even one penny is spent dealing with any issues abroad. Until the national security state begins addressing those issues above all others, it is clearly not fit for purpose.

A bigger army is as useless as a chocolate teapot if the nation does not first have seamless food security, water security, energy security, and communications security. It has exactly the opposite.

A government that spends more effort and money on arming another nation than it does on restoring the food and energy security for the people and the nation it exists to protect, is clearly a government that is not abiding by its social contract, and is no longer fit for power.

The more cynical observer might conclude that such an extreme lack of attention given to such core security matters suggests the strong possibility of a purposeful undermining of the nation’s infrastructure by fifth columnists within the civil service and government.

It really doesn’t matter whether such a fifth column is political in nature or a more visible takeover of the nation by transnational corporations, the effect is still the same, and such globalist institutions and parasitic dynasties of toxic wealth should be treated as foreign enemies, because that is exactly what they are.

It’s time for the indigenous people of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales to fight back against the transnational and globalist takeover – Peacefully, Lawfully and Democratically.

The Angloriginal™ movement website and posts will be addressing these core security issues, and presenting radical policy proposals to rectify them.

The turnaround must begin now, and we cannot wait for the less than adequate individuals in public office to be replaced before we begin to discuss and solve these critical matters.

It is now down to the people to formulate their own policies, to be implemented by a future government that truly represents the Angloriginal people.