How to Secure Britain and Avoid War

As the scripted fifth columnist puppet politicians in government continue to push for a war with Russia that the indigenous people of Britain neither side with nor called for, there is a growing comprehension by the general public that all the warmongering, all the civil unrest, all the online system failures, all the social turmoil peddled by the mainstream media, and of course, the migrant invasion, have not occurred organically.

To the contrary, they have all been fully orchestrated.

All are stage-managed campaigns, designed to coerce and manipulate the people to fall inline with certain concealed agendas, the core hidden objective being to completely undermine and destroy the nation from within.

The indigenous people of the nation have been systematically socially engineered over decades to not resist the takeover by the globalists and their transnational corporations.

War is their final solution to attempt to stop the awakening of the people to this reality.

Social media is the enemy of the state because it is social media that has allowed so many people to discover the falseness of their Truman Show existence.

You are living on a film set, constructed a century ago to entertain, distract, and control Western civilisation. We are now in the last quarter of that film, where the main character – the people in this instance – are coming to realise that everything they have been told since birth is a lie, and that behind the curtain; somewhere behind the stage set, is a producer and a production team.

It won’t be long until the majority of people fully understand exactly who those social engineers really are – the ones who have been ordering and funding all the deception, mayhem and death, and that is the reason why the puppeteers are pulling the strings of their politicians so frantically right now.

If the government and the civil service was still being run by indigenous Angloriginals, rather than by the fifth column globalists who solely work to undermine the nation and its people, we would have already seen Internet safeguards that fully protected children, but which gave adults the capacity to share information freely without being falsely called “conspiracy theorists” or “far right extremists”.

The people have simply taken up the role of the ‘fourth estate’ of government, a position which the mainstream media forfeited many decades ago.

One of the greatest deceptions of the last 250 years has been the lie that wars just happen. The well acknowledged truism “all wars are bankers’ wars” tells in five words a greater truth than a book could explain in 500 pages.

In essence, it really is that simple, because it is the central bankers that have sat at the top of the money pyramid over that period of time. They have always funded both sides of every war and revolution, and have securely held both the puppet strings and the purse strings that control the politicians. Their motto might be, “You can just pay them to pull them, and if you can’t pay them, you can always push them.”

As far as those who have orchestrated them all are concerned, war and revolutions in modern times have always only been about two things. Firstly, geopolitics and the gaining of political control over ever greater swathes of society and humanity, and secondly, the making of vast amounts of toxic wealth to add to the mountains of cash, gold and treasure that they have already hoarded away.

These orchestrators of war guarantee their profits on every occasion, via their war loans, their arms sales, and their control of the ‘nation building’ that they instigate once their armaments have completed the destruction they require in order to reshape each nation to suit their plans.

It’s always a con. The people always pay for the con. The parasitic class always profit from it. Thems the rules!

It’s been almost 110 years since ‘The War to End of Wars’ and over 80 years since the follow up war that was required to clean the slate for the formation of the EU, along with certain geopolitical objectives in the Middle East.

Since that Second World War, the British military has participated in over 20 further wars and conflicts, including the Korean War 1950-1953, the Falklands War 1982, the Gulf War 1990-1991, the Somalian Civil War 1991-present, the Sierra Leone Civil War 2000-2002, the War in Afghanistan 2001-2021, the Iraq War 2003-2009, the Libyan Civil War 2011, the ongoing conflicts in Syria 2011-present, the Ukraine Conflict 2014-present, and the Yemen Conflict 2014-present.

With the exception of the Falklands War, all involvements can be described as geopolitical rather than defending the nation against any kind of invasion force.

Indeed, since World War II, there has only been one occasion when millions of British people have openly talked about the need to defend against an invasion, and that time is now.

So how does the British government respond to the people pleading with their elected politicians to protect them against this invasion?

They hand over billions to fight even more foreign wars, and subsidise the ongoing ‘invasion of Britain’ with an endless stream of taxpayers’ money, while thousands of indigenous men, women and children remain homeless or destitute, with millions more suffering in poverty, and fearing for their personal safety, their national security, and the future of their nation and their culture.

Furthermore, as the nation economically and culturally implodes, the government and the machinery of state do everything in their power to propagandise for an even greater foreign war against Russia, insisting that indigenous men of fighting age must prepare to enlist to fight yet another orchestrated military conflict thousands of miles away.

At the same time the indigenous people of Britain continue to demand that the betraying state protect them against the very real and present dangers that are growing by the day, and fuelled by the almost unlimited financial and verbal support of the vast majority of politicians for every alien culture and non-indigenous individual who is fleecing the nation and threatening its indigenous people.

Perhaps there are some in public service who are not the traitors they appear to be. Now is the time that those individuals need to stand up and be counted. Peer pressure, career politics, or needing to pay for the lifestyle you have grown used to enjoying, can never excuse such a betrayal of the people who you are paid to serve – the native indigenous peoples of the Anglo Isles.

You are either on the side of the indigenous people and the nation, or you are on the side of the millions who have come to take advantage of them. You can no longer be for both and remain a credible voice in the room.

It’s not difficult to secure a nation against invasion, and in the modern age, you don’t do it through conventional military means. Just look at the wars in recent years to understand that reality. Compare the conflict in Ukraine, with the conflict in Iran. What’s the difference? Isn’t it obvious why Eastern Ukraine fell so quickly, and why the greatest military force in the world can’t succeed in Iran?

It’s all about the solidity of the nation’s culture and the heritage that bonds the people. It’s about ‘cultural fellowship’.

Ukraine was only very recently manufactured as a nation. Before World War II, most of it was part of Russia, and the rest was divided between Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia. In its short existence, it has never been a nation of one people. Therefore, it was never going to remain as one nation.

In contrast, Iran (Persia) has existed for over 2,600 years, being first unified under the Medes in the 7th century BC. Even when the people of Iran fight amongst each other, almost all of them will come together to defend Iran against a foreign nation, people or culture. Anyone who understands this knows that even Islam must bend somewhat to Iranian cultures and norms, in order to remain in power in the country, and Iran will continue to exist long after the Islamic state there has disappeared.

There are a number of simple steps that will ensure the highest level of defence to a nation in the modern age.

1. Properly Educating the People on Their Indigenous Culture.

In order to best secure a nation from invasion, you need primarily to make the country as unrulable and unfavourable to opposing cultures and people as possible, while at the same time bonding the indigenous people as tightly as possible, by instilling the principles, values and norms of the indigenous culture into the minds of its people, from the earliest age.

2. Not Promoting or Funding Other Cultures.

The government and public services must only ever fund or promote indigenous cultural standards, and never do so for alien cultures.

This is not about outlawing other cultures, but simply about recognising that the duty of a government is always first and foremost to the indigenous culture, the indigenous values, and above all, the indigenous people of the nation.

3. A Constabulary Dutifully Bound to Serve Only the People.

The nation requires a genuine constabulary – not a police force – sworn to serve only the people, not the State, nor the Crown, nor the freemasons, nor big business, nor any other corporate body.

4. A Domestic Army Trained for Defence Inside the Nation’s Borders.

In the age of drones, energy weapons and AI, a traditional army will soon be as useful as the proverbial chocolate teapot. A new army is required with new leadership and new thinking.

The nation does not require hundreds of thousands of canon fodder recruits. Everyone has seen in Ukraine how that turns out. It’s really not dissimilar to WW1, in which armies of men were slaughtered by the millions because they were fighting in trenches, subjected to attack by modern technologies against which they had no adequate defence.

Almost every soldier in a modern defence force (and defence is the operative word) should be an elite soldier trained for special operations, primarily for deployment on home soil.

The main defence of a nation’s territory needs to be just that – defensive, making it as difficult as possible for the homeland to be attacked, and above all, occupied by a foreign force. Understanding the nature and the specifics of the home nation to be defended must be the main focus of any army, navy or air force.

Defensive technology can be permanently situated in every city, town and village, with both military and authorised indigenous civilians being trained in the use of such technology, for deployment in the event of an invasion.

5. A Purely Defensive Arms Industry.

The arms industry works for profit, not the people, and not for a better world – only for profit. That’s so important to understand and to never forget.

Every arms manufacturer and research company should be either closed down or repurposed to develop and manufacturer only weaponry and technology to be used in a defensive capacity by the nation and its people.

Properly applied technology is the key. Currently, technology is being used to create ever more lethal weapons for the purpose of destruction, to sell for profit to any psychopathic dictator or warring nation that has the money to pay for such destructive armaments.

In a defensive model approach, technology research would be focused towards totally different types of weapons and facilities that could make the entire nation a no-go prospect for any foreign force.

In terms of a national defence strategy, other nations in Europe have a great deal to learn from Switzerland’s political, economic, social and military strategy over the last 200 years.

As time goes on, Angloriginal™ will be digging deeper into such broader ways of ensuring a nation’s security, not through arms and warfare, but through promoting peace and international assistance. Watch this space – the real solutions will be found here.

6. An Indigenous Populace Trained in Domestic Survival and Defensive Strategies.

In the case of a military invasion, or any other similar occurrence or large scale emergency that threatened the indigenous population, the general public currently have no training in how to respond.

This lack of preparedness due to a complete lack of legitimacy of the political establishment and the civil service is clearly calculated, and has been designed to leave the nation in a state of panic in the event of such a crisis.

There are hundreds of thousands of indigenous Angloriginals who would be more than happy to give up a day or two in their month to become part of a civil defence force, not to use weapons – although some may be required to have a basic knowledge – but to become proficient in far more important skills and community infrastructure roles, in preparation for any national, regional, or local emergency.

A few of the most responsible and capable indigenous people within each community will need to be trained in militaristic defensive strategies. This is obviously important in the case of an actual invasion or extreme civil unrest.

Even an army that is properly repurposed to defend the nation cannot be deployed into every community in the case of a violence-orientated national emergency, and so it will be essential to have a small number of individuals who will be able to defend each community, and have the added advantage of knowing their local area like the back of their hand.

However, the majority of any civil preparedness strategy involves sustaining the local infrastructure, maintaining a sense of calm within the community, and monitoring the area for any emergencies, and subsequently dealing with the minor ones, and working in collaboration with emergency services when required.

There are 1001 things that could and should be included into such a preparedness strategy – too many to list here – but future Angloriginal™ articles and casts will be detailing further proposals.

Above all, communications, assistance and supplies for each community – a street, a village etc – and particularly for those who are most vulnerable, is a priority. Direct communication between each Civil Preparedness Group, and also from those CPGs to government, military, and all emergency services is also essential.

In the case of any such emergency, it is the local people who best understand their area, and therefore it seems so obvious that trusted members of each community should be trained as the representatives for the welfare of their communities in times of crisis.

A bonus knock-on effect of this strategy is that it will automatically create neighbourhoods that watch out for one another at all times. Those who remember the ‘neighbourhood watch scheme’, which had local representatives liaising with the police, getting to know the local residents, and even patrolling some streets at night, will recall how this helped bring communities together and made people feel safer, as well as reducing crime.

Why such basic preparedness has not already been done illustrates the degree of complete ineptitude of all those in positions of governmental power.

7. A Robust Infrastructure that is Nationally Sovereign.

This last point is such a crucial one. From food supply, to energy supply, to communications, the country has been systematically turned into an infrastructure basket case.

In the last 30 years, everything has been centralised to such a bizarre degree that if only a couple of dozen transnational companies were to stop providing their services, the average person sitting at home would suddenly have no communication with the outside world (similar to 150 years ago), no lighting, heat, or power (worse than 150 years ago), and no access to food, or even water (never before experienced).

Again, once you understand the hidden agendas behind the globalist/transnational takeover, you come to realise that none of this has happened by chance, and everything is planned to weaken the nation and the indigenous populace for when the time comes to switch everything off.

Over the coming weeks, months and years, Angloriginal™ will be doing a deep dive into this and related topics regarding how we must restore and rebuild our society, better, stronger, more prosperous, and ever more focused towards serving its indigenous people – not foreign interests, the corporations, or the parasitic class.

FOOD SECURITY

On the matter of food security, the main solutions are very simple. An indigenous-centric government needs to restore the traditional lines of food supply from growers to local stores to households.

This isn’t about replacing the entire supermarket system – although that would be nice, it’s simply about ensuring local, regional and national security by having robust supply chains that will remain completely unaffected if the transnational and multinational systems break down.

This connectivity between small local business must be encouraged with tax breaks and other incentives to encourage every local producer, transporter and end seller to work only with other small, indigenous businesses that are invested in the local area, and which could continue to operate as normal even if the entire centralised system of retail was shut down.

ENERGY SECURITY

There’s a reason why the World Economic Forum started demonising wood burning stoves about 10 years ago, and why globalist governments such as Canada have been pushing for the banning of them in the last few years. They provide fully independent energy to homes that a centralised energy grid cannot control, monitor, charge for, or shut down.

Net zero and the green energy movement has one main (hidden) agenda – to transfer all light, heating, communication, and power in the nation over to a new SMART controlled energy grid-system that is completely owned by transnational companies. It’s essentially just one more huge monopolised takeover of our national assets by transnational forces.

This centralised energy system needs to be stopped for national security reasons. In the case of a catastrophic national energy-grid shutdown, the nation would be thrown into immediate chaos, and each year, that chaos is only going to be worse, as homes and business are tied in ever further to the digital energy-grid.

The more homes and businesses that are able to run independently from the grid, using locally available fuel, and reliable, renewable energy stores, the more that life will be able to continue as normal in such an emergency, and mass panic and crime will be avoided.

In the case of a war, these independent energy requirements, ideally implemented to some degree for every home and business, are even more of a necessity.

COMMUNICATIONS

Now, let’s just take a slightly more in-depth look at one element of this infrastructure problem to understand a very serious national security threat and how to solve it. Let’s look at communications, and in particular, phones.

Thirty years ago, practically everyone in the country had an analogue landline hardwired into their house. Indeed, until very recently, I was using a beautiful, original 1950s Bakelite phone, which used the same technology as it did 70 years ago, and it worked just fine. It also had the added advantage of not getting computerised sales calls, but that’s another story. As of last year, it no longer works, because practically all the lines in the country have now been digitised.

Digital phone lines are great for centralised monitoring, data mining, hacking, and spying with, but apart from those wonderful benefits, the downside is that when those centralised digital systems are brought down, you lose that communication with the outside world.

Now, I’m not saying that analogue phone lines can’t be compromised, but what I am saying is that in most cases you would still be able to communicate with the outside world using the old system unless the main junction boxes ceased to operate. In comparison, the new system is incredibly vulnerable to being shut down, and it won’t be long before just such a failure is experienced by everyone.

Mobile phones are just as vulnerable to being shut down from central locations, and any major attack on the nation’s communications infrastructure, whether though hacking or kinetic attack, would obviously target both Internet/digital services and mobile communications.

In regards to national security, I am yet to hear one single person in the government, security services or so-called communications experts mention this change over from analogue to digital as presenting any concern whatsoever.

Imagine it is a Saturday evening just before Christmas. You are sitting at home. Your teenage kids are out partying at someone’s house a few miles away. Members of your family are travelling down across country to stay with you. You’re on your third glass of wine, and suddenly the TV goes blank. You look at you phone and there is no connectivity and no Internet connection. You pick up the house phone, and its the same. What do you do? Well, frankly there’s nothing you can do. Now imagine it stays that way for 24 hours, or 3 days, or more.

Such a scenario is not just possible, it’s absolutely certain to happen at some point in the near future. Hacking, terrorism, war, an EMP attack, an orchestrated shutdown, a solar flare, or any other natural disaster – the list of potential causes of a catastrophic digital failure to the entire nation is almost endless.

Most politicians simply aren’t bright enough or moral enough to give such certain future events the priority they deserve. Why? Because in doing so, they would need to warn the people against an industry that is worth trillions in profit for those who are forcing it on the people, whilst providing no warning of its negative consequences in respect to personal and national security. By allowing your world to be completely digitised, with no alternative, you are riding for a fall.

So what’s the answer? Well, for starters, new hardwired analogue communications need to be installed throughout the country, connecting not only emergency services, key public services, and other high priority services in the case of an emergency, but also key members of each community, such as the Civil Preparedness Groups mentioned above.

It would also make sense to once again provide such secure analogue communications to the general populace, although this would obviously entail a much bigger and more commercial orientated rollout.

Secondly, it’s important for the indigenous people of the nation to organise themselves and take their own independent steps towards securing communication with each other. This should be done at the community level as well as the family and friends level.

One device that I can immediately recommend is a CB radio / walkie talkie.

The normal maximum distance for a CB radio is around 3 to 4 miles, but can reach up to 7 miles under optimal conditions. Since 2006, CB radios have not required a license in the UK. Standard CB radios have 40 channels, so even if multiple groups of people in your neighbourhood decide to invest in them, with a little cooperation, everyone can organise themselves to have specific channels for specific people or services.

These factors make CB radios a superb choice in emergencies for use as a communications channel both for communities that wish to organise themselves, and for family and friends who live within a few miles of each other.

CB radios range from around £50 to upwards of £200, so are a reasonably inexpensive way to guarantee continued communication with your family, friends and neighbours who live in the same village, town, or neighbourhood.

If you want to be extra secure, keep at least one set of any device in a Farady bag or box to shield them from a EMP attack, which may affect even simple electronic devices, and is certain to affect more complex electronics.

Remember to stock up on good quality batteries too. Batteries are usually not affected by an EMP attack. However, electronic components in modern rechargeable batteries may be damaged if they are connected to a power source during such an attack. Alkaline batteries and other non-rechargeable batteries are generally more resilient to EMP effects.

If you’re still thinking that conventional wars – like the one that the politicians and so-called military experts are currently attempting to push on the British people – are in any way a practical solution to anything, think again.

An arms race mentality and offensive military strategy have always led to one outcome for any European nation that has adopted such an approach. A destruction of its cities in retaliation by the opposing force. Only those countries that have not fired weapons into other nation’s territories have escaped this fate, most notably Switzerland and France.

From the British perspective, we can learn this factual lesson from World War 2. Despite have an airforce that was fully capable of bombing the country, Germany did not bomb Britain until 7th September 1940, as a retaliation against the British bombing of Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne, Mannheim, Stuttgart and other cities that they had started bombing six months earlier from 9th March 1940.

In the 21st century, an entirely new approach to national security and international relations is required, and this begins with ditching the tired old 20th century rhetoric and geopolitical objectives of the globalists and warmongers who sadly still occupy the top tables in global politics. Their time is coming to an end.

The people need to take charge of the discussion. This is the true purpose of social media, as a tool of the ‘real’ people who want international peace, not war, and secure national sovereignty and genuine international relations, not a borderless world or chaos.

It is only the psychopathic scum who rise to the top of the political barrel who foster war. The billions of mentally normal people on the planet want peace, and they must now begin to deal directly with each other – adopting a people’s politics – to achieve that global objective.

This is another reason why the cultural sovereignty of each nation is so important. Every person represents their own cultural standards, whether they are aware of it or not. In order to attain a peaceful world without war, every culture needs its own geographical space in which to breathe, civilise itself, and peacefully make the case for its own culture to the people of the world.

In a society in which war and violence were not relentlessly promoted by the usual suspects, but instead the only war was a culture war of ideas, with those ideas being analysed and voted on by the people of the world, we would soon have the utopia that we all wish for.

If the psychopaths weren’t in control, this could be achieved. Those who desire the entire world for themselves – the globalists – invented the false concept of multiculturalism, forcing non-indigenous people into nations that they do not belong to, and pitting one disparate culture against another, in order to undermine, fleece, and eventually own those invaded nations.

You and I have the answers to the world’s problems, not the corrupted psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists who have self-appointed one another as false representatives of the people. They are nothing of the sort. They are corrupted carpetbaggers, nothing more.

The vast majority of people on this planet want peace. It is the politicians who always get in the way of that movement for world peace. They do nothing to help attain it – not in the words, nor their actions, nor their policies.

All those who are currently pushing for Britain to go to war with Russia belong in one or more of the following three camps:

1. Those who are fifth columnists and are actively working for the destruction of the British nation and its people.

2. Dyed-in-the-wool military men who are still thinking in terms of books on war written 30, 100 or 200 years ago, and are invested in retaining the same military system that they have worked within for decades.

3. Those who are financially invested in the arms industry or have related business interests.

It’s time we all called out these fakes and fools for exactly what they are…

Destroyers of society.

We need builders, not destroyers.

The Angloriginal™ movement website and posts will be addressing these core security issues, and presenting radical policy proposals to rectify them.

The turnaround must begin now, and we cannot wait for the less than adequate individuals in public office to be replaced before we begin to discuss and solve these critical matters.

Positive change that will not be compromised can only be achieved if our thoughts and actions always remain peaceful, lawful and democratic.

It is now down to the people to formulate their own policies, to be implemented by a future government that truly represents the native indigenous culture and people of the Anglo Isles – the Angloriginal people and their incredible values and cultural heritage.